Impact of Regional Anaesthesia on Postoperative Outcomes in Hip and Knee Joint Replacements: “A Comparative Study"

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dr. Ashwani Kapoor1, Dr. Maneesh Bhothra2, Dr. Shailendra Srivastava3

Abstract

The analysis of the demographics and interventions in 200 patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgeries came out. Most patients underwent neuraxial blockade as anaesthesia, and a big proportion was randomised to the two intervention groups. Interventions differed, with analgesic medicines as the most common. Follow-up durations varied from less than 12 hours to more than a year, the majority of patients being monitored for between 1 and 7 days. Neuraxial blockade and local infiltration were found to have positive associations with the outcomes by multiple regression analysis. Outcomes were only reported, of these the most frequently recorded measures were a satisfaction score. The results of this study may offer insight into the choice of anaesthesia.


 


Keywords:  Hip or joint replacement, Anaesthesia, Pain management, Patient outcomes, Follow-up duration.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Dr. Ashwani Kapoor1, Dr. Maneesh Bhothra2, Dr. Shailendra Srivastava3. (2024). Impact of Regional Anaesthesia on Postoperative Outcomes in Hip and Knee Joint Replacements: “A Comparative Study". International Journal of Medical Science in Clinical Research and Review, 7(05), Page: 978–986. Retrieved from https://ijmscrr.in/index.php/ijmscrr/article/view/878