Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Junior Doctors vs. Senior Doctors in Interpreting Common Findings in Chest X-rays

Abstract

Background: Chest X-rays are one of the most frequently utilized diagnostic tools in clinical medicine, providing crucial insights into various pulmonary, cardiac, and systemic conditions. Accurate interpretation of these images is paramount to ensure appropriate patient management. Given the gradient of experience in the medical field, the diagnostic proficiency between junior and senior doctors is often debated, with implications for training, supervision, and patient care.

Objective: This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of junior doctors (those in their years of post-graduate training) with that of specialist registrars and senior doctors (with more than ten years of post-graduate experience) in interpreting common findings on chest X-rays.

Methods: A set of 10 chest X-rays, comprising a mix of normal and those with common pathologies, were presented to both junior and senior doctors, ranging from trainees to the specialist registrars and consultants in the field of radiology. Their interpretations will be compared against a gold standard provided by experienced radiologists.

Significance: Understanding the discrepancy in diagnostic accuracy between junior and senior doctors can guide further training protocols, ensure adequate supervision, and optimize patient outcomes. This study also sheds light on areas of potential improvement in the radiological training of junior doctors and emphasizes the importance of continuous medical education across all levels of expertise.

Keywords: Chest X-ray, diagnostic accuracy, clinical radiology, radiological interpretation, medicine