Navigating the storm: Analysing the impact of recent controversies in NEET entrance exams on students and medical institution

Abstract

Introduction: The National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) serves as a gateway for medical education in India. However, controversies related to eligibility criteria, examination patterns, and administrative inefficiencies have created undue stress for aspirants and negatively impacted medical institutions. This study examines these challenges and their implications for students and faculty. Materials and Methods: A mixed-method approach was adopted, using stratified random sampling to survey 500 NEET PG aspirants and 50 faculty members. Quantitative data were collected through online questionnaires, while qualitative data were gathered via interviews. The analysis focused on stress, academic performance, and perceptions of the NEET process. Results: Quantitative results showed that 64% of aspirants reported increased stress, and 51% experienced anxiety due to controversies. Nearly 47% noted a decline in academic performance, with mock test scores dropping by an average of 15%. A small proportion (2%) considered quitting or pursuing alternate career paths. Faculty responses indicated significant curriculum misalignment (48%) and increased workloads, with 72% observing a decline in student confidence. Discussion: The findings highlight the psychological toll of systemic inefficiencies, including inconsistent cutoff scores and lack of transparency in the counseling process. Comparisons with existing literature underscore the role of societal pressures and prolonged preparation periods in exacerbating stress levels. Faculty stress due to curriculum changes further underscores the need for reforms. Recommendations include enhanced mental health support, simplified admission processes, and better communication between stakeholders to rebuild trust in the system.

Keywords: NEET controversies, medical education, student stress, faculty workload, policy reforms, mental health